Science, Creation & EvolutionNEW THEORY!Tuppence I have looked at the data, and in fact I have followed quite a few of your links. I have found the majority (VAST) to be exactly like the ones I pointed out to you. It seems you indiscriminately post links to "studies" that either don't support your position, or they are biased YEC sites that distort the data. I asked you to present some academic and scholastic support for your husbands position, and you produced the sites that I showed did not support your position. If anything, it seems YOU SHOULD LOOK AT YOUR OWN SITES a little better before you post them as positive responses to my questions. They in fact seem to support me rather than you. Now, if you have any relevant data to review, please post it. By the way, the critisisms of Ross were equally lame, and unfounded if anyone gets past the verbose nature of the essays to evaluate what is really being said. The jist is always "he is unbiblical cause he doesn't agree with our idea of exegesis". This is pure hogwash. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame