ArchivedCalling all Catholics!IAMFREE, I honestly cant be bothered to waste my time on that anti-Catholic propaganda. Do you believe everything you read on the net? And how did this website come about to you? How do you know this? are you interpretating scripture? whosurdaddy Wrote: "When Rock came to Antioch I directly withstood him, because he was clearly in the wrong. He had been taking his meals with the Gentiles before others came who were from James. But when they arrived he drew back to avoid trouble with those who were circumcised. The rest of the Jews joined in his dissembling, till even Barnabas was swept away by their pretense. As soon as I observed that they were not being straightforward about the truth of the gospel, I had this to say to Rock in the presence of all: 'If you who are a Jew are living according to Gentile ways rather than Jewish, by what logic do you force the Gentiles to adopt Jewish ways?' " Galatians 2:11-14 The "rebuke" in Galatians is perhaps the primary "proof text" Protestants will use in their attempt to show that Peter/Rock was not "Pope" and was not infallible. Paul did correct Peter over a social issue, not a doctrinal point! Paul was correct, and how do we know this? Because Peter said that Paul was correct! At the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15:1-12). Peter, at the Council, had already infallibly settled the issue! Paul properly "rebuked" Peter/Rock for not following Peter's own teachings. Peter's role at the Jerusalem Council, and the Council itself, help to clearly establish that what was involved in the "rebuke" incident was not Peter's teaching but, at most, Peter's failing to abide by what he already taught and believed. whosurdaddy, study your bible. Aieno Wrote: lol, Aieno you never cease to amaze me. When you cannot answer something you "blubber" around and find something to say. The primacy of Peter is biblical, open your eyes and you will see it. Peace |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame