Science, Creation & EvolutionHello! 14 here.
Of course it's not. You haven't done anything to demonstrate this. Science takes a stance based on evidence X. If we learn later on that evidence X is flawed, then we improve upon our existing theory with new evidence. What we do not do is state "X isn't true because it could change tomorrow". That would be your straw man implication. LOL You don't need the bible to know the thing the bible indoctrinated you to believe to be true is true. Got it. You don't need Eistein to know that gravity exists. You do need Einstein to understand how gravity behaves... unless you're content with blissful ignorance. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame