Science, Creation & EvolutionHello! 14 here. It seems you have a problem comprehending English. Pastuer and Roemer used observed and tested data and your rebuttal site appeals to accepted theories that are based on defined constants, which ignore data the call the status quo into question. For instance there is a growing segment of secular physicists and astronomers who are questioning the defined speed of light, which is used in all determinations of the age of the universe. Also your comment concerning faith is a strawman since I did not bring up faith, you did.
Einsteins special relativity emphatically states that nothing in the universe can exceed lightspeed, yet cosmology has measured galaxies moving at speeds that exceed lightspeed. Now, since "c" is a defined constant that ignores that outer space is not a pure vacuum are the ages determined by appealing to a defined constant accurate? Also the latest observations of redshift are marginalized by the majority of scientists who refuse to question the status quo.
Now, let's address you rebuttal site with this rebuttal to your site:
The Top 30 Problems with the Big Bang
Here is another site that questions the Big Bang:
In the past four years crucial observations have flatly contradicted the assumptions and predictions of the Big Bang. Because the Big Bang supposedly occurred only about twenty billion years ago, nothing in the cosmos can be older than this. Yet in 1986 astronomers discovered that galaxies compose huge agglomerations a billion light-years across; such mammoth clustering of matter must have taken a hundred billion years to form. Just as early geological theory, which sought to compress the earth's history into a biblical few thousand years crumbled when confronted with the aeons needed to build up a mountain range, so the concept of a Big Bang is undetermined by the existence of these vast and ancient superclusters of galaxies.
These enormous ribbons of matter, whose reality was confirmed during 1990, also refute a basic premise of the Big Bang - that the universe was, at its origin, perfectly smooth and homogeneous. Theorists admit that they can see no way to get from the perfect universe of the Big Bang to the clumpy, imperfect universe of today. As one leading theorist, George Field of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, put it, "There is a real crisis".
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Cosmology ... Theory.htm
| View Parent Message View dfilename Return Home |