Again, I never suggested or asked anyone to believe that Jesus was divine. To say that someone's argument is flawed, does not mean that I am of the opposite camp. For the fourth or fifth time, the whole topic is not about Jesus' divinity, but about the silence of the Qu'ran regarding the purpose of a virgin birth. My only comparison was that, as Adam was the beginning of something, so was Jesus. If to you that means divinity, then so be it. But you can't accuse me of something you created in your mind.
Jesus is divine, whether he be in a trinity or just the eternal Word of God, or the eternal Wisdom, or the Logos, or the Son of God, the Bible clearly testifies of this. If the chroniclers of the NT did not think so, then they would never have used words like theos to refer to Jesus or his nature.
You contradict your own argument about the comparison between Christianity and pagan mythology, for you wilfully ignore that the virgin birth is also part of pagan mythology. If you are willing to say that one aspect is wrong, for its similarity to pagan mythology, then you must accept that the other is. In doing so, you prove your own beliefs to be wrong. Or do you mean to say that you don't believe the virgin birth either? You can't prove my view wrong, without proving your own belief in the virgin birth to be of pagan origin.
If you believe the NT is divine, then you must admit every aspect of it, or else drop the religion.