The concept the Holy Spirit is another person separate from and an emanation from God is right out of Gnosticism, which believes that a holy God cannot touch or indwell evil flesh. Gnosticism also believes that all flesh (saved or not) is evil. The church councils depended on Greek philosophy and ignored those Scriptures that tell us the Holy Spirit is in fact God, not a person seperate from God.
Wrong. This concept is straight from the Bible which flat out tells us the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and is our Advocate. That belief is wrong because Jesus was God incarnate and was perfect and not evil.
You're trying to escape something very obvious and put forth in scripture, I don't get that.
Now, the fact you have not really contributed to the other threads dealing with the Trinity and have tried to take this thread off topic is proof to anyone who reads this thread as well as the other threads that you cannot get around all the Scriptures that show the Trinity is nothing more than an invention of Greeks influenced by Greek paganism, political pressure from the pagan Emperor Constantine, and Greek philosophy so heavily influenced by Gnosticism they destroyed the foundation of Christianity, which is the apostles and the prophets.
I've explained it well the last post. Rather than importing pointless garbage into the argument, why don't you personally show how I'm wrong using my arguments and the verses that I use for evidence? if I'm so wrong and you're so right that won't be challenge.