Christian/Muslim ThreadsQuranic Contradiction?I would like to know Abdullah's comments on this thread.
Now compare this to the following; Surah 5:103
Surely this is a contradiction! Salih's camel was "a She-Camel OF ALLAH", that means that she belonged to Allah. A Sa'ibah camel also belonged to a god, whether it was Hubal, Allah, or any other deity. Salih's camel was also a "sign from Allah", tell me what is the sign in a simple camel if it is not a Sa'ibah, Bahirah, Wasilah, or Hami camel? Salih's camel was set loose for free pasture, which was a typical pagan practice as we can see in the cases of Sa'ibah, Bahirah, Wasilah, and Hami. Interestingly, the other Qur'anic verses pertaining to Salih's camel omit the part where she was set free to graze. Instead she was supposed to be allowed access to water. Salih's camel was to be allowed free pasture, that in itself forbids anyone from eating her or working her. I know it is not a Muslim practice today, but it certainly looks like it was Salih's practice to anyone with an unbiased interest in the subject. You can close this case by showing me an evidence that clearly distinguishes Salih's camel from a Sa'ibah camel.
Also Ibn Ishaq the Muslim Historian was quoted in the biography of Muhammad (Ar-Raheequl-Makhtum by Safiyr-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri);
Also Ibn Hisham 1/90-90;
Both camels were; 1) Signs/Miracles 2) Set free 3) Belonged to a god It is clear that a Sa'ibah camel was a she-camel set free in the name of a god, as a result of the "miraculous" feat of producing ten consecutive females. Salih's camel was a she-camel set free in the name of Allah , as she was a "miracle" or a "sign" from Allah. So the question is this; DID ALLAH INSTITUTE THE SETTING FREE OF A MIRACULOUS SHE-CAMEL IN HIS NAME? YES OR NO? Maybe you can tell us what was so miraculous about Salih's camel. . |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame