Christian/Muslim ThreadsQuranic Contradiction?
I know what a "Munafiq" is, it is a hypocrite. I have not shown any signs of hypocrisy. Tell me, why must you attack my personal character in order to put forth your case? Is it because you are running out of options? Salih's camel was "a She-Camel OF ALLAH", that means that she belonged to Allah. A Sa'ibah camel also belonged to a god, whether it was Hubal, Allah, or any other deity. Salih's camel was also a "sign from Allah", tell me what is the sign in a simple camel if it is not a Sa'ibah, Bahirah, Wasilah, or Hami camel? Salih's camel was set loose for free pasture, which was a typical pagan practice as we can see in the cases of Sa'ibah, Bahirah, Wasilah, and Hami. Interestingly, the other Qur'anic verses pertaining to Salih's camel omit the part where she was set free to graze. Instead she was supposed to be allowed access to water. Salih's camel was to be allowed free pasture, that in itself forbids anyone from eating her or working her. I know it is not a Muslim practice today, but it certainly looks like it was Salih's practice to anyone with an unbiased interest in the subject. You can close this case by showing me an evidence that clearly distinguishes Salih's camel from a Sa'ibah camel. I have brought my evidence, and you have brought nothing but your own words. You quoted a source from Bukhari but you did not provide the Hadith. No wonder, as it only enhanced my case when I quoted it fully. Both camels were; 1) Signs/Miracles 2) Set free 3) Belonged to a god Maybe you can tell us what was so miraculous about Salih's camel. . |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame