Science, Creation & Evolutionhumans run to scavange???I always laugh to myself when i see this. Sure you can try and point out things that are wrong with evolution, thats how science betters itself. What i don't understand about creationists is that you think that by proving that a part of the theory of evolution is wrong you somehow prove creationsim is right. Its more logical to believe in evolution not because its perfect but because it fits the data best, it can explain everday phenomenon such as the making different breeds of dogs to the formation of new viruses. Creationism on the other hand has no evidence to back it up besides a bunch of 2,000 year old manuscripts that have extraordinary claims without the extraordinary proof to back them up. It makes no varifiable predictions about biology and those that it does make about geology have been proven wrong. (ie. age of earth, by using every known dating method with a range beyond 6k years) Why is it more logical to believe creationism? The only reason i see to believe in creationism is if you ALREADY believe in god and an inerant bible before you see the facts. Shouldn't it be the other way round, you see the facts and find that Creationism is the best theory. 8) Until you can prove why creationism is right rather than evolution wrong the vast majority of scientists will just laugh at you. 8) |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame