Helix wrote:Ah, but when we fail to reproduce 'a burning bush that is not consumed' we've entered the realm of biblical mythology? And can you scientifically proof that a person can walk on water or turn water into wine?
How can a book, that's full of IMPOSSIBLE things, be considered a book to base scientific research on! Sure, some - perhaps a lot of things -are bound to be true, but I don't think you have a method to seperate the facts from the myths!
By your own standard, you just disputed Darwins book, upheld the bible.
Origins is full of beautiful artist renditions, and hypothesis, while by your own admission the bible has hard factual truth. THANKS!!