And i unlike muslims would never use vague scientific references in the bible as a means of proving it's divinity. Just as i have been proving you right now, this would make a weak case. Embryology was known in the Uphinashad the oldest... therefore the Uphinashad must be of Brahman/God i guess?
You might want to reconsider that.
Garbha Upanishad wrote:8. The embryo lying (in the womb) for (a day) and night is a confused mass; after seven days it becomes a bubble; after a fortnight, a mass and in a month, it hardens. In two months develops the region of the head; in three months, the feet; in the fourth, belly and hip; in the fifth, the backbone; in the sixth, nose, eyes and ears; in the seventh the embryo quickens with life and in the eighth month, it becomes complete.
English isn't my main language, yet you understand what i say in english. Why is a quran incapable of translation without perverting or corrupting it, in such a way. That it's fully untruth concerning science. I raise my doubts with such. Even Aristotles, Hippocrates, Galen and such are open for translations... yet the all powerfull word of God can only be uttered in understanding only in arabic.
You well know that this has nothing to do with what we say. H2O gave a good example with translation of alaqah. Also surely understanding Qur'an in its original language is wiser than criticising its translations.
can be? might be?
is interpretating stuff to your benefit... called science now?
I said they are my interpolations and do not bind Qur'an.
6) Another creation. This I think is when the material is breathed upon a soul.
So abortion is allowed in the islam, before this stage?
You are right, Islam itself rules out this option. Then "maybe" the phrase "another creation" means that the physical characteristics that make each human unique appear at this stage.
This mentions alot of stuff that is excluded in the quran, where does all what is said in here comparable in utmost detail to that verse in the surah?
A Biology 101 textbook excludes many things in biology too.
And the fact is that Qur'an is not a textbook. The issue here is whether anything in Qur'an contradicts established knowledge of science. As you see Qur'an depicts gradual development of fetus, and we can make one-to-one match between Qur'an and science. Thats all.