Christian/Muslim ThreadsQuran (& Hadith) full of scientific errors!!H20, seriously, are you that blind? yes well here's the quranic dogma, the main thing a translator does, and what counts for a translator is that the meaning stays... but keeping the authencithy of the words used... word for word translations are absurd, and not even a translation... and i don't think the quran translators do that word for word either. i still think it's absurd to think that only semetic languages as in the Quran cannot be translated in english while books about Ibn Batuta, Al Ghazali, Ibn Farabi and Ibn Rushd are translated by the numbers in clear language. and yes, sure a scholar who wished to study it would find more interest in original arabic scriptures of them... yet with the quran, you don't have original arabic scriptures, you only have three old ones and they are strangly enough forbidden from public and investigation for some reason... any real scholar who studies scriptures doesn't study mass produced copies of the the original, but only the original... so even your claim that people should read 'the root' is baseless, since you don't have one. with greek and hebrew manuscript the root can be checked for any christian or jew who doubts the authencity of the scriptures. Hippocrates in his works, defined seed, where it came from, it's theories of it's use, etc... making the translators possible to know what he reffered it too. Unlike Muhammed you need to take a wild guess... just like muslims do today, they chose the interpretation that is in their best benefit That's not even in the quran, that's a interpretation of an interpretation... and if i had to chose whom to learn embryology from in 600 AD i'd chose Galen, Hippocrates or Aristotles... cause with Muhammed's vagueness you wouldn't be nothing without the other 3 having to explaining it. Proving that scientists need to add unto the quran, and not the quran unto science. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame