Science, Creation & EvolutionCan God be proven scientifically?I think the Illias and other books that age, are just as true as the Bible. A nice story. Nothing more. Just as I don't believe that Poseidon caused Odysseus to roam the seas for many years, I don't believe Jesus was the son of God. I think it is more likely that Odysseus just got lost. Maybe in a storm or something like that, but not having anything to do with whichever God. Other more factual books from that time are not considered as absolute truth to me. I can accept that they might be true, but you won't here me say that i know for sure that they are. Another example is the Carbon dating which creationists use to support their stance. Those same dating methods can be used to support the evolutional evidences of nature. The only difference is, the dating method used is less accurate for evolution than for the Bible, seeing that the prophetic evidence in the Bible goes back only thousands of years, but evolution milions of years. Therefore, to reject the evidence which supports evolution is to reject the evidence of your own view. But the evidence on your own view justifies evolution more than your own view. Amazing isn't it! It certainly is! It almost works to say it the other way around!! Just a little mistake in the last line. The Bible supports itself more then anything else of course. Would be stupid for whoever wrote it to make it support anything else. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame