fuzz2050 wrote:pascal says that it pays to belive in god,
while it might not be proof, it answers the practical appliatinos of the problem. the philosohpical debate will go on for as long as........well, i dont know, but the practicle application seems quite clear to me"
_____________________________________________________
This statement is tantamount to an admission that Pascal's Wager does not squarely answer the debate topic. Please read it again. Your statement is irrelevant, immaterial and impertinent. It simply falls flat on its face.