LOL, sure here it comes:

This is the outrageous theory of anti-Creationists, but it should be noted that over time, things slow down, degrade, and get worse. Trees degrade and go back into the soil. Soil doesn't grow into a tree. Trees come from a planted seed, the seed grows, lives its life, and degrades, going to where it belongs.

Yes trees degrade get worse when they get older. To preserve the race it reproduces itself. That is the key-word here. According to what you say, every life on earth will extinguish itself. It wouldn't surprise me if humans extinguished themselves oneday, but I find it very hard to believe that trees will one day be gone, because they degraded over time. If you don't believe in macro-evolution, then there is always the micro-evolution.

2. Moon Landing Disproves Evolution
Before the moon landing, scientists had thought that if Earth and the Moon really were billions of years old, the surface would have eroded away into dust, thousands of feet deep, which would be dangerous for astronauts in the case that they might sink into the Moon's surface like quicksand. But when they landed on the moon, they discover only a little bit of the surface eroded away and there was a very thin layer of the dust.

I thought this one was the best joke. Erosion is caused by small forces over a very long period of time. Those forces here on earth are caused by wind and water mostly.
What do you think would cause the erosion on the moon? The big nothing from space? The only dust on the moon is probably from colliding asteroids.

3. If Evolution Were True, We Would Have No Sun
Our sun shrinks at a rate of 5 feet per hour. If we were only to go back one million years, going by the rate of the sun's shrinking, the size of the sun would have made so much heat that it would be impossible for life to survive on Earth. This puts a one million year limit on Earthling life. Evolution requires a 4 billion-year-old Earth.

Thats a funny one as well. Lets not go back a million years but several billion instead. Do you think the sun was filling the entire universe back those days? I don't think so....
You take the situation as it is now and extrapolate it to a million years ago, without even considering that the situation now, hasn't always been the situation.

Another thing Jovaro: The moon is moving away from the Earth at approximately 2.14 inches per year, say 2 inches even ... That means last month moon was closer to earth, and last year it was closer, and so forth ... If we reverse time back to a few million years ... The Moon would have been so close to earth, Tidal waves would have flooded earth 2 times a day. Need i even say more.

Lets make it a billion years again. That would put the moon on the other side of the earth and it went straight through the earth somewhere along the way. Can you show me the hole where it went trough then? Should be pretty big....
Situation now does not equal situation x years ago. Or maybe it did, but there is no way to prove it.

4. If Evolution Were True, Saturn Would Have No Rings
The rings of Saturn are constantly being hit by meteoroids. Scientists estimate that the rings will have been blasted away in 10,000 years. Using the rate of bombardment, if the solar system had been around as long as Evolution requires, the rings would not exist on Saturn.

In chemistry we call that a balance reaction. Free translation from dutch, might not be the good word. One part of the reaction takes away the rings, and another part builds it up at the same time. Dust and small asteriods get caught by the gravity of Saturnus and form new material for the rings.
You are saying that a lake will be empty in 5 years because the water is flowing out at this and that rate, but then forget that there is another river filling the lake at the same time.

5. Population Growth Supports Young Earth
Evolutionists suggeest man has been around for about a million years. At the current rate of population growth (which is about 2%), the population, today, should be 10^8600, which is a 1 with 8600 zeros behind it. For Evolution to be true, you would have to drastically cut down the rate at which generations progress to about 0.002%!

Keyword there is current. Who says it was always like that? I tell you that it wasn't.

Anything else?