No offence, friend but what you say is the face of ignorance. This boy love buisness sickens me, but it is ineed none of my buisness - or yours for that matter. If you beleive that any kind of sexual relationship involving chilrden is something vile, you are ignorant. If you think that a sexual relationship with a child is taking their innocence away and no one has the right to do that, you are ignorant. If you beleive you or people as a community are entitled to make descisions for the child and the child is not old enough to make those descisions themselves, you are ignorant.
Let me tell you that I grew up in russia. Nice enough place i suppose but one must learn quickly there, or will find themselves in deep trouble. At the age of 10 i knew more then the avarage american adult, and i was definatly ready to make descisions about my sexuality, and i did - didnt do anything. The point is, if you think just cause she/he is a kid, theyre much too innocent and inexperienced, youre sadly mistaken.
No one has the right to take the innocence of a child? Ok then is it the innocence or the child that you cant take. Cause "innocence" isnt a thing of age, i know people that are just as innocent at 23. That leaves the child bit. And as i said before, its totaly up to the child at that point.
Speaking of inexperience and the rest... You could say that about 30% of the world's population doesnt know enough to make that kind of choice. As I said, at the age of 10 i knew more then a 20 year old amarican on avarage, now if im supposedly not old enough to choose if i want to have sex, does that mean that the 20 year old american cant either?
Dont take what i said as an attack of some kind, its just my usual argument tone.