Sorry about that everyone, i wasn't in the best of moods when i last posted. So i posted something purely emotional, with less (much less) than satisfactory factual information, and said things without taking the time to properly form my argument. The point I got across was very, as Aineo said, ignorant, and frankly, Stupid.
I guess, after reflecting, animals can not be capable of morality as geshtinnanna said, it is a man made system, o f which is of human ethics.
What i would like to say now is that perhaps there is some similarity in what we would consider morality, to some acts performed by animals, such as the lioness and the dogs I mentioned in my last post. When we see an animal act out of character, is that just an abnormailty in the behavioral paterns of that species, or is that abnormality there due to some effect of a conscience, or something similar to our morality?
Is it possible though that when animals do act 'out of character' that it is a result of some similarities with human 'reason'? I am curious.
The only thing I would question with the examples you produced Aineo, there are exceptions in humans to both of those examples ( humans can control sex drive and aggression). There are humans that do have no desire to control their sex drive, and humans that can not control their agression. So is it not there fore at least possible that there are exceptions to the examples you used for animals?
Reason, is something that may share similar results to morality, perhaps that is what we see in animals, opposed to moral judgment. By reasoning the situation, one may act reasonably, as they would have, acting morally.