absolutetruth wrote:
this is all fancy and eloquently demonstrated, but how in the world can we understand John 1:1 under these precepts?
if you're saying that a "divine plan" was really what John was referring to as "logos" when he wrote John 1:1, how then can a "divine plan" BE God? this "explanation" of this verse seems to pose an even bigger problem for those who deny Jesus' Divinity. Trinitarians maintain that Jesus was Divine and uncreated, so to say that Jesus (logos) was God, is perfectly legitimate.
however to say that God's "divine plan" (an obviously created thing) IS God, is to say something that's even more difficult to sustain.
Aineo, you didn't respond to this.