Pint0 Xtreme wrote:Aineo wrote:If you want me to stay on topic then you stay on topic and cease making accusations you cannot backup with facts. You brought up polygomy and make a broad statement that is blatantly false concerning polygamy and Christianity. I simply showed that you are incorrect.
Are you nuts? You even acknowledged my statement that Christians were polygamous in ancient societies. Now, you're contradicting yourself?
No I am not nuts, but apparently you can’t understand what is posted. Polygamy was common in some ancient cultures and is still practiced in some Arab nations, what I showed you is that God’s design for marriage has always been one man/one woman. Polygamy was practiced among Mormon’s but they are not true Christians. Polygamy has never been an accepted practice in Christianity and even Jews had ceased to practice polygamy centuries before the birth of Christ.
I do not deny that the fastest growing segment of the population to become infected with HIV is heterosexual women with African American women leading this group. However the infection rate among gay men remains at about 50% of all new cases in the United States. Now since only about 2.8% of our adult population is gay what does this indicate?
It only indicates that HIV first appeared in gay men and is now decreasing as gay men are now more aware of HIV than other segments of the population, such as heterosexual women. Being gay has absolutely nothing to do with getting HIV other than the mere fact that it is in a large population of it.
Again you are incorrect. HIV was brought into the United States from another country where HIV is epidemic in both sexes and although the media hype in the U.S. has focused on gay men the fact is there was a population of Haitian immigrants in Florida who were also infected. Worldwide the infection rate is slightly higher in women than men.
Before you continue to deny reality I suggest you check your facts:
http://www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/aidsstat.htm
And once again you are not reading my posts with any real discernment. The CDC, which tracks national stats on STD's has stated gay men are from 5 to 5000 at greater risk of infection; the CDC does not state heterosexuals do not contract STD's.
SOURCE PLEASE.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/dstd/Press_Re ... ay2000.htm
The Centers For Disease Control And Prevention has available statistics on STD’s.
You comment concerning vaginal cancer is laughable since men don't have vaginas; yet all human beings have an anus. Also what you are ignoring concerning the Netherlands study is this study was done in a gay friendly country where gay unions are legal therefore once again you are side stepping reality.
My comment was only to highlight your ridiculous corrolation between anal cancer and gay men without any logical bridge. They call that a non-sequitur.
Really?
http://www.metrokc.gov/health/glbt/analcancer.htm
http://www.gayhealthchannel.com/analhealth/
As to environment, even secular scientists and psychiatrist state one cause of homosexuality is the result of environment so you are helping me make my case.
No, you're misunderstanding me again. If psychological problems occur due to environment factors, it would mean that gay men get those problems from their environment instead of the mere fact of being gay. Homosexuality is not destructive. A hateful society is.
And you seem to want to avoid what secular studies have shown to be true. Would you consider the Netherlands a hateful society?
Tell me Pint0 Xtreme do you know how to do an Internet search, or are you simply posting your idiotic opinions because you are to lazy to check your facts?