Evidence for ID and creationA or non-AGetting back to the point -- which is that evidence against evolution may well be considered evidence for creation unless a third model is presented -- I again repeat, this is not a false dichotomy. If something has NOT evolved, then what is left? That it was always that way. Was it, itself eternal? Not given the evidence we see regarding geology, physics, astronomy, biology and genetics! Therefore, if an organism has not evolved, it had to have been created in that basic form or type. Taking the opposite point of view, if creation can be shown to be false, then that is clear evidence for evolution. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame