Evidence for ID and creationA or non-AThat is only one of many sites that demonstrate Joe has an agenda that has more to it than pure science. Your rebuttal site ignores the fact the debate challange was issued by Creationscience.com and has nothing to do with Meert's attempts to alter the parameters with a hand written change to the agreement. This forum was opened to discuss evidence for intelligent design not to debate intelligent design so Joe's attempt to take control of another forum is not going to be tolerated and neither is a public debate concerning the management of this board. BTW, tuppence is a woman and based on your email address I presume you already know that since you are apparently related to or are Joe Meert. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame