When you refuse to discuss what is not published in sceintific journals you are in fact attempting to control what is being discussed on this board. When your main reason for posting is to oppose what you see as a socio-political agenda then science is not why you post.
Can the evidence of science demonstrate an intelligent designer - yes or no? In my opinion the answer is yes. Would an intelligent designer use similarities in physiology for different species, families, orders, and etc.? Why not? Once a basic functional and efficient design is determined why redesign or change it?
ID and atheism are not science but how one understands science can be filtered through ID and/or atheism to come to whatever conclusion one desires to draw based on an agenda that has nothing to do with science. It seems your agenda is to trash what the evidence can show and not to teach science per se. Your agenda seems to be to control how people understand science and by taking control of peoples minds you control a society.