Science, Creation & EvolutionSudden appearance of phyla in the Cambrian explosionOf course. I have no problem with intrepretations. Evidence 'proves' nothing. It only supports or negates. In this case the evidence is overwhelmingly supportive of evolutionary theory. I would say that there is no such thing as a partially formed, so we agree on that point. As to 'created', no, there is no evidence of creation by a supernatural being. This is a classic YEC red herring: Turn the discussion into a semantic argument and redefine the terms to match the agends. It should be clear to everone here that we are discussing the modern synthesis of the theory of evolution. That includes all aspects of common ancestry and adaptation. Always? What are you saying here? This is silly. My point was that courts have accepted circumstantial evidence. Do you agree or not? |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame