Science, Creation & EvolutionInteresting discussion from Steven Jones on leaving theWell I'm not a scientist, so I go by what the majority have given their consensus on. Obviously if what you suggest could LIKELY be an alternate theory with equal or greater amount of evidence, then they would have brought it forward. To suggest otherwise it to accuse scientists all over the world of a global conspiracy. I DEFINITELY do no buy that. I'm asking a group of very hardcore science types on a favourite forum of mine to comment on your above paragraph. I'll let you know what they said. Sure. I agree totally. But that's not what I was going at for an analogy. lol. I just meant that objectively we can all prove we see the same thing. Science is only a TOOL. It doesn't HAVE to replace religion you know. If someone wants good morals to follow, (and in my opinion FAR superior morals compared to Christianity as we know it today), try here: http://www.americanhumanist.org/index.html I know nothing about it, so I can't comment. However as the other large essay I posted before explained quite clearly, Darwinian theory has nothing to do with evolution as a fact now. As it described, many later discoveries confirmed evolution, and updated a vast majority of points regarding it. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame