You are in fact spamming this board.
As to requesting the credentials of those who have chosen to spam this board; why should we accept anything any of you post?
Yehren, I have taken the time to read the Articles of Confederation other than the first article. Canada is mentioned in one article as being able to join the United States without the approval of the other states. This is not included in the present Constitution.
Now you can nit pick U.S. history without changing the fact that George Washington was the first man elected President by the people of the United States under the Constitution of the United States.
I guess you are ashamed of your degrees.
Joe, as to personal attacks when you accuse scientists of pseudoscience only because they disagree with you, you are in fact posting personal attacks aimed at people who are not here to defend their positions.
That's why I've been quite adamant about the lack of scholarly published research on the part of ye-creationists (on the topic of ye-creationism). I know that this is how science is done and how science makes progress.
One of my uncles was the head of the engineering department of the University of Utah, I have a cousin who recently retired from teaching geology at the University of Missouri, I have another cousin with a Ph.D. in physics and all of them have informed me that getting any concept reviewed in scientific journals is next to impossible if the article contradicts the "party line". You know this to be true as well as I do, therefore your insistence that only peer-reviewed articles contain topics for discussion is both self-serving and ludicrous.
Behe, Wells, Meyers, and other scientists have published books and articles that are informative and, in my opinion, call many concepts of evolution into question. By your own admission you would rather debate what you refer to as a socio-political agenda than science.
Faraday, Michael
English bookbinder who became interested in electricity. He obtained an assistantship in Davy's lab, then began to conduct his own experiments. He wrote a review article on current views about electricity and magnetism in 1821, for which he reproduced Oersted's experiment. He was one of the greatest experimenters ever. Because he was self trained, however, he had no grasp of mathematics and could therefore not understand a word of Ampère's papers. In the course of his experiments, Faraday discovered that a suspended magnet would revolve around a current bearing wire, leading him to propose that magnetism was a circular force. He also discovered magnetic optical rotation, invented the dynamo (a device capable of converting electricity to motion) in 1821, discovered electromagnetic induction in 1831, and devised the laws of chemical electrodeposition of metals from solutions in 1857.
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Faraday.html
Education in a specific field is not required to understand science or to do science.
As to your neurosurgeon example, I would not hesitate to ask a neurosurgeon with specific practical knowledge of mechanics a question regarding an engine or car if I knew the neurosurgeon personally and the individual had the knowledge to diagnose engine or car problems. I am not a mechanic, however my father was and I learned by the apprentice method how to diagnose most engine problems before I graduated from high school.