Science, Creation & EvolutionInteresting discussion from Steven Jones on leaving theJM: THe problem is simple, the scientific evidence for ID does not exist. JM: I'm glad you get the point. I would not repeat it 50 times if it was clear that everyone I was discussing it with got the point. JM: The body of literature on ID does not exist in the scientific literature and thus they deserve no special comment or respect. However, I posted a link to some comments on Behe and ID in general and gave a link. I was told that this site is not supposed to be used in that way so google my name and ID to see my comments. JM: You are almost correct. I pointed out the motivation AND I also pointed out that this, in and of itself, does not discredit ID. I think I was very clear on that point. JM: So do I. I think God is responsible for evolution. JM: I believe in creation as a matter of faith. I do not believe in ye-creationism of the kind espoused by folks at AIG, ICR etc. Fortunately, science does not require faith only evidence and my bone to pick with ID and YE-creationism is that they bring forth very little scientific evidence to support their case. In fact, the last published technical article that had a direct bearing on a YE was by RObert Gentry back in the 1960's. Nothing since then and nothing on ID in peer-reviewed scientific literature. If you want to discuss evidence, then point me in the direction of the evidence you want to discuss by referencing the appropriate scientific literature, that's all I am asking Cheers Joe Meert |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame