Bush invaded Iraq claiming that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Not giving reasons why they thought this - or rather making them up (probably because America sold them to him in the first place). Then oops they didnt find anything. Bush then swiftly changes his story. He did it to liberate the oppressed iraqis!! Well that's all good but they aren't really in a better state of affairs now are they? And since when does bombing a school fall under the term 'liberation??' Apparently they thought it was 'a werehouse. Yes..... its a werehouse for stroing nuclier devices cunningly disguised as children in play....... right :roll: .
And Gerani is right: Bush was arrogent about it. Even more annoyingly however, Tony Blair actually agreed to help him! Why!? We sent our troops in to help and we where basically treated like a human shield for the americcan troops. The americans even shot a load of our soldiers! They didnt bother to apologise for it. 'Oops... we thought they where werehouses...'
Also, and i hate to say this, but Bush is an idiot. He really is. 'Don't misnunderestimate me...' what? what on earth does 'misunderestimate' mean?? Oh wait... there aint no such word. 'The question not being asked enough today: is our children learning?' can't help but spot the errors there.
And then there's the assumption that nations that have weapons of mass destruction are 'threatening world piece...' unless of course they are the west. Because we're more civilised you see :roll: . Therefore we have to go around policing the world.
FIGHTING for world peace is one of the biggest oxymorons of all time. Because anyone could say that. 'I'm bombing this country so they give up and surrender and then there will be piece. Therefore i am fighting for piece.' It's about as pointless as saying 'im going to make love to as many people as i possably can in a short space of time in the name of virginity...'