The point is NOT whether certain animal behavior is "good' or "bad" but whether it is NATURAL behavior in animals in the wild.
Since, animal homosexualiity is ubiquitous in the WILD animal kingdom from insects, to reptilles, birds & mammals, it is natural and not the result of dysfunctional cultural aspects as some people conjecture to be the cause of alleged "contra natura" homosexuality in humans.
That Paul, among his other lunatic rants, has referred to homosexuality as "contra natura" only betrays his ignorance as to the facts of animal sexual behavior.
Again, as much as many would like to gussy up humanity with semi-divine attributes, humans are animals &, as such, their homosexuality is just as NATURAL (for those who have been biologically oriented towards homosexuality) as animal homosexuality.
NON SEQVITVR: I was watching a Discovery Channel program recently where a female gorilla was taught to communicate with humans using sign language. The gorilla was cogniscent of right & wrong & able to understand simple abstracts & the thought hit me what would the gorilla answer if asked where did a gorilla go when it died? The theological implications would be staggering no matter what her answer.
In another program, a male chimpanzee mourned his mother's death until he, too, after pining & refusing to eat, died not far from where his mother's body returned its atoms back to the ALL.
Sort of reminds me an old, old Addams Family cartoon book I once saw. There was this man walking on the beach & he came across some tracks which seemed to begin from the water's edge. The tracks started as a dragging wriggle which progressed into little reptilian tracks, then footprints somewhat mammalian, then apish, then human. I wonder if he were to have followed the evolving tracks beyond the sand dunes, he would have, finally, found himself face to face with an airborn spiritual entity with anthropomorphic features?
Oh, cackle.