The Paluxy tracks are not dino and man in all probability. Please read this page: http://www.grisda.org/origins/14033.htm
Art Chadwick is a personal friend and a highly qualified double doctorate -- one of them being in geology and the other in microbiology. He has inspected the tracks.
In the meantime, Baugh and those he is associated with have NEVER even submitted a paper on these tracks to either of the creation journals. They have both pleaded with him to submit material so that it can be examined and reviewed. They have consistently ignored and/or refused.
Art is a highly respected scientist among both evolutionists and creationists. He is a creationist himself but very concerned that things be scientifically verified. The Paluxy tracks are not only not verified but not what the Baugh team claims they are!
In the meantime, we have records from Alexander the Great's army of a run-in with some kind of giant monster when they were on their way to India. We have paintings of various land and sea 'monsters' which are quite accurate when compared to the fossil record -- on vases from Rome! We have the records of 'dragons' from China. And the list goes on and on.
Please, PLEASE don't use the Paluxy material as evidence! Don't use ANYTHING from the Baugh group as evidence -- they are not reliable at all. They are the people who, along with Kent Hovind and a few other popularizers, have helped give creationism such a bad name and allowed it to become a laughingstock among some.