Hey Believer want MORE Gospel Tales that dont agree, Ill make this one easier for you
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS:
After the resurrection, on the first day of the week, were the disciples:
a) Worhsipping Jesus on a mountain in Galilee (Matt 20:16-17)
OR
b) Eating Supper with him in Jerusalem (LUke 24:33-35)
The Luke Gospel accounts for the entire day of the resurrection. According to Luke, Jesus traveled in disguise with two men on the raod to Emmaeus (about seven miles from Jerusalem), stayed with them into the evening, had supper and further conversation with them, then vanished out of their sight and reappeared that same evening at the meeting of the eleven in Jerusalem. If we are to believe this account to be true, then it completely invalidates the Matthew accounts in which the eleven travel on the first day of the week to a mountain in Galilee (OVER seventy Miles away), to worship Jesus there (Matt 28:16-17)
Also, If Christ wanted to convince the world that he had risen from the dead, why did he only appear to his Close friends in SECRET?
In First Corinthians 15:6, Paul gives an account of Christ appearing to five hundred people at once after his "resurrection". "However we do not have 500 witnesses writing 500 letters attesting to their witnessing the risen Christ. WE have one man, making this claim, and this one man, by his own admission, not only did not believe this at the time that it happaned, but actively persecuted those who did believe it. Here is a witness swearing as true something he did not witness himself, the same thing he formerly swore was false. What is our basis for believing him? I find none.
ANOTHER TALE also,
Was there an ascension?
a) The Book of Mark says that Christ appeared to the eleven as they sat at meat. After jesus had Spoken to them. He was recieved up into heaven and sat at the right hand of God. However, All this is contained in the last 12 verses of Mark, verse that CANNOT be found in the oldest and best manuscripts of the Gospel according to Mark.
b) The OLDEST book of Luke manuscripts just says he Departed from them and does not MENTION ascension. The ascension was added to later versions of Luke.
c) The writer of Matthew and the writer of John make NO mention whatever of any form of ASCENSION of Jesus.
Divine Inpsiration in the writing of these stories is altogether out of the question, since divine inspiration would not Incorporate falsehood and contradicts into the body of its writings.