ArchivedAhura Mazda has 101 names: The Quran vs. the AvestaPeace Alexei, Start another thread on this, okay. This discussion here is very important, stop trying to change it's direction. I haven't seen anything that scares me from these mystery cults. Most of them borrowed their beliefs from Christianity!!!! Anyways, the Biblical Jesus is fully supported in ancient prophecies. That's all I need to verify that the Biblical Jesus is the real Jesus. And I'd like to throw in--there's alot of historical evidence to verify Jesus's crucifixion. That was no myth. Or maybe your copying rubbish from hokey sites. Now those later geneologies are accurate, but those very ancient "Adam to Noah" records aren't something I take to heart. At least the Bible doesn't say the sun sets into a muddy pond!! Or that jinn and seven heavens exist!! That rubbish was borrowed from ancient Arabian paganism, mystical Jewish books like the Zohar, and Zoroastrianism. No, you misunderstand. The story of Noah's ark is very very similiar to the pagan Sumerian's "Epic of the Deluge." Here, Gilgamesh is commanded by the god Utnaphitsim to build a great ark and to bring aboard his family and a host of animals. A flood kept his boat aloat for a long time. Then he set forth a dove, but it returned. Then hesent out a raven, and it didn't return. You can read the Epic of the Deluge ath this site: http://www.okbu.edu/public/academics/sc ... lgaweb.htm This doesn't bother me however. Was Noah really Gilgamesh? Was there ever a Noah? It doesn't bother me at all. Mankind became evil, and God punished them by wiping out alot of them in an disaster. The few people that were righteous and God-fearing survived and thrived. Now that's for another thread. Did you read the Avestan version of Noah's Ark? http://www.avesta.org/vendidad/vd2sbe.htm Interesting, what do you think about it? You try to bring Jesus up in everything! Jesus's crucufixion isn't a story, it's a definite reality verified by historical sources and the Gospels. Years were recorded differently vack then, anyways did you read the begininng of Yima and the deluge? It is difficult not to acknowledge in the latter legend a Zoroastrian adaptation of the deluge, whether it was borrowed from the Bible or from the Chaldaean mythology. The similitude is so striking that it did not escape the Moslems, and Macoudi states that certain authors place the date of the deluge in the time of Jamshed. There are essential and necessary differences between the two legends, the chief one being that in the monotheistic narration the deluge is sent as a punishment from God, whereas in the dualistic version it is a plague from the Daevas: but the core of the two legends is the same: the hero in both is a righteous man who, forewarned by God, builds a refuge to receive choice specimens of mankind) intended some day to replace an imperfect humanity, destroyed by a universal calamity. It didn't escape the Muslims! You placed your the date for Noah the time of the Jamshed. That's not the Bhagavad Gita. The fact that they're two different religions is proof that they're two different religions. You're really pathetic, and you're really losing this argument with me. As if perverting what the Bible states isn't enough for! Now you're perverting what I say! Don't bother responding to me again unless you can take a scholarly and mature approach to this thread. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame