Science, Creation & EvolutionCreation vs. Evolution, general discussion
What I gave you was an interesting behavior of a UNICELLULAR amoeba (I never said all amoeba were single-cell, but this one is, read the excerpt). I did not claim this was HOW a single-cell evolved into multi-cellular organism. I did note that the question you asked was a good one, but not currently answered by science. THis organism is being studied precisely because it sometimes behaves as a uni-cellular organism and sometimes as a multicellular organism. Furthermore, this change is forced by environmental factors and is triggered by a biochemical pathway. Thus, there may be useful information regarding the question you had. Science is about learning, it's not about having all the answers. I never said they were. I said these particular amoebas are both! Nor am I, it's a boring subject Why not? This is simply a statement of your personal belief. Please refer back to my original questions and one other...(1) Is it your contention that a good scientific theory must explain everything? (2) What is your preferred explanation for the Cambrian explosion? (3) What sort of tests can be applied to your explanation for the Cambrian explosion? (4) What evidence would lead you to conclude that your explanation for the Cambrian explosion is incorrect? -E |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame