gerani1248 wrote:Gerani1248, is that picture of that Indian woman you ?
And by the way, what do you mean when you say that...." it is not as immoral as hetero sex". Explain what you mean.
lol i'm a guy. that picture is a picture of Frida Kahlo, the Mexican painter (whom i adore) from the cover picture of VOGUE.
what i mean, by hetero sex means that I as an individual accept gay sex as normal as heterosex, cept that they cant reproduce, thus serving the point of pleasure which seals thier marriage (assuming the couple did marry and were virgins (no premarital sex) which is waht im for). they cannot reproduce. that is not a good reason why they cannot marry because there are many hetero couples where its physically impossible to have children. hetero couples do have sex for pleasure like gay couples do.
As to gay unions, we are taking a Biblical stance to oppose a human behavior that is contrary to God’s revealed truth while you on the other hand have judged those in the gay community in violation of the Scripture you quote to support legalizing gay unions.
hmm a biblical stance in this country. are we talking about America? land of the free? the religiously impaired? gay marriage here? (shock) catch the sarcasm
trying to lighten up. wee i just fed the duckies! weee.
but it says in the bible that gay sex immoral not gay love, and thats ur beliefs, i respect that, but they are not mine.
so thats the end of that. im not here to persuade you to either side.
lol. i dont even know why sometimes...