I hate to disappoint you, but I am very, very aware of everything you are talking about.
First of all, atomic constants have been measured as changing -- a number of them are not constant. And this means that radio decay rates have changed as well. The question would be 'how much?' And the answer, if one follows the curve and does the math involved, is that the rate at the origin of the universe was incredibly high -- around 10^11 times faster than now. There was a rapid drop very quickly and by the time of Abraham in the Bible they had pretty much steadied out to close to what we have today. But that also means you need to deal with some equations to get atomic dating, which is what radiometric dating is, to correspond to orbital dating, which is how our calendars run. They are not the same by any means.
Evolution predicts fossils? No it doesn't. We found them long before any predictions were made. And both evolutionists and creationists interpret fossils.
Trees -- you are talking about dendrochronology, which is highly suspect past about 4000 years ago for a number of reasons. Let me know if you want to know more about it....