I think that all of you agree with me that illustrating any person in an offensive mode is against morality and it's nothing to do with freedom of speech.
Danish news papers instead of publishing how Muhammad (peace be upon him) is in fact,
And how His message (Islam) contributed in the modern civilization, or at least repeat what
the famous historians said about this message and its prophet they did the contrary …
why they did not published something like the following passages for instance :
" … From a new angel and with a fresh vigour it (the Arab mind) took up that systematic development of
Positive knowledge which the Greeks had begun and relinquished ….. Through the Arabs it was and not by
The Latin route that the modern world received that gift of light and power. "
H.G. Wills : The outline of History, p. 327.
" It is to Mussulman science, to Mussulman art, and to Mussulman literature that Europe has been
In a great measure indebted for its extrication from the darkness of Middle Ages."
Marquis of Dufferin and Ava: Speeches Delivered in India
London 1890,p.24.
"IF A MAN LIKE MOHAMED WERE TO ASSUME THE DIC TATORSHIP OF THE MODERN WORLD, HE WOULD SUCCEED IN SOLVING ITS PROBLEMS THAT WOULD BRING IT THE MUCH NEEDED PEACE AND HAPPINESS."(George Bernard Shaw)
The following is a link for an article written by a famous Arabic scholar: copied from http://www.sahab.net/sahab/showthread.p ... did=331102
I hope that someone who know very well English and Arabic languages translate and past it
Here.
Thanks