Peace2God'sPeople wrote:
This is why I have made the reference to Paul, the Gospel of John, and the effects of the Nicene Creed (formulated in the interest of the Roman government that wanted a unified church doctrine so it could attempt to unify the empire under one church). All of the above have played a role in twisting Christ's message away from the emphasis in Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Especially when very convincing evidence is given that certain scriptures in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, appear to have been "doctored" largely in an effort to support the theme of the Nicene Creed.
.
If you want to talk about the TRUE CHRISTIANITY you have to be willing to admit that it existed before the Roman government and the early church councils corrupted into a faith that allowed and, perhaps, encouraged a sense of nationalism among its believers.
You say that I fanatically rant.
I say that it sounds perfectly logical. What is so mysterious and twisted about the corruption of the scriptures and faith that so obviously happened?
Out of time for now,
Peace2God'sPeople
Again you speak ignorance about the early ecumenical councils and the creed.
Why can't you just steer away from what you don't know about, by your own admission?