Aineo wrote:Didn't Darwin write that the fossil record would be incomplete and have "missing links"?
Well, if it is incomlete, why must there be 'missing links'? And please define 'missing link' for us.
The media used the phrase "missing links" when I was a child; so your theory that this phrase comes from creationists is ludicrous.
I never said so - who are you replying to?
The use of the Holocaust is insensitive. Jews were not the only people murdered by Hitler and as I posted we have eye witness accounts as well as photographic evidence. There are also the records kept by the Nazi's.
Yes, I know. Gypsies and homosexuals were also killed. But I fail to see why you are harping on this, when it is quite clear that I am not talking about the Holocaust as such, rather, I am making an analogy to those who deny it and want their position aired to those that deny 'darwin.'
I think holocaust revisionism is disgusting.
Evolution such as the diversity of chiclids in Lake Victoria is not the issue and you know it.
No, I don't know it. That is evolution, whether you want it to be or not.
Don't play the fool J-dog, no one is questioning variation/diversification within a biological group such as chiclids. It is easy to show this is factual. What is the issue is evolution of reptiles to mammals, which cannot be shown.
It can be inferred via multiple lines of evidence.
I leave playing to fool to others.