Science, Creation & EvolutionInformationI never thought of Genesis as hogwash. I can only go with what God actually says. He says: Gen. 3:22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil [/b] Depending on what you want to call an "ape", Australopithicus and Homo could be apes. But that is not the usual usage. It is a nice intermediate between earlier primates and humans. As you see, the feet, hips, and femurs of Australopithicines are more like humans than they are like apes. Science has done very well at finding the truth, while disagreeing with that assumption. As a practical matter, that's not what happens. It turns out that inferences based on evidence have worked very well for science. The fossil is just one more bit of a very large body of evidence. You know a tribe that has no art at all? I am astonished. What tribe? You are referring perhaps to my post on some of the differences between anatomically modern humans and Neandertals? The remarkable thing is how very long Neandertals kept their toolkit essentially the same. Humans, at least anatomically modern ones, change such things rapidly. We have only one documented case of Neandertals adapting a more modern set of stone tools, and those were near the remains of modern humans, from which they presumably borrowed the ideas. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame