Science, Creation & EvolutionSetterfield again :: Re: Setterfield again
Admiral Valdemar is perfectly right, this should be clear even if you stick to the hypothesis of your husband. No one questions that the speed of light in matter (c') can have almost every value. It's an interesting topic but has nothing to do with our discussion. The speed of light in vacuum (c) is just another term for the maximum possible velocity in our universe. And this speed is the same everywhere, in matter and in vacuum. On the other hand c=c' is only valid in vacuum. A possible change of c as discussed in the scientific community has more or less always to do with the fine structure constant alpha. Your proposed change of c has nothing to do with alpha. This is one of the reasons why such a change would be unobservable. Again I recommend you to reread the other c-decay thread and try to understand, why unitless constants are so important. Which journal? Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington? I allready recommend you to try to publish the work without the untenable conclusions, just as some interesting trend in historical speed of light measurements. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame