Science, Creation & Evolutionall hominids are homo sapiensActually, gradual modification is exactly what evolution proposes. Furthermore, you apparently agree with macroevolution, since after all, the common biologist's definition of it is evolution at or above the species level. Or are you using a different definition of 'macroevolution' which I'm not aware of? Before we continue, please define your version of the term 'macroevolution', and explain why the distinction must be made between it and 'microevolution'. You clearly do not understand the analogy. Both are small processes which, unimpeded, accumulate over time. If you wish to suggest that there's a problem with this, it's your burden to demonstrate it, not mine. Besides; you haven't even given me an actual definition of whatever version of 'macroevolution' you're using in this argument. Valdemar already handled this point, although I would like to know exactly how many peer-reviewed scientific journals Mr. Setterfield has had his results published in, the dates of the articles, whether they're readily available, etc. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame