Science, Creation & EvolutionSpeed of LightThat's really frustrating. Tuppence, I would suggest you go back and reread this thread. The point isn't, that we did measure a c-decay because the standard meter in Paris did change. That's nonsense. The point is that if a change in c happend, especially a change in sync with other atomic processe as you initially claimed, that it would be impossible to notice this. The length of any ruler is proportional to c. And any ruler really means any ruler. The standard meter, a wheel, the distance between two mountains or two planets. As long as you insist on a simply change of c that's physically irrelevant. You have to speak about a change of c in relation to something else, that isn't dependent from c. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame