Well, let list what we do know:
Fact #1
Jesus and Lucifer are not the same. Though both are identified with a somewhat similar name , they are not identified with the same name. Lucifer is called "son of the morning"; Jesus is called "bright and morning star". Not the same! Lucifer, in the Isaiah passage that has been quoted, has been shown to say things like "I will be like the Most High God." Jesus already is the Most High God, so if Jesus were Lucifer, it wouldn't make sense for him to say that.
Fact #2
Jesus and Satan are not the same. This is proven by the fact that the Bible calls Satan the father of lies among other things. We know that Jesus, being God, is completely holy and therefore cannot have any sin in him, thus could not possibly be the father of lies.
Fact #3
The Isaiah account is an account of the first sin ever commited by a created being. This first sin was commited by Lucifer, so we would be correct in calling him the father of sin. It follows that the father of sin would be synonymous with the father of lies (because, while his specific sin may have been pride, it cause him to speak lies - it was a lie that he could become like the Most High God).
So we know that
- Jesus <> Lucifer
Jesus <> Satan
Lucifer = father of sin
Satan = father of lies
father of sin = father of lies
So by substitution
The fact that you've said this:
read the Apocalypse, 22nd Chapter
a few times in this thread proves nothing because Apocalypse is not a book of the Bible. The Bible is complete truth. All other books are man-made and fallable, so they cannot be trusted like the Bible. Why go to some other source other than the Bible when all the answers you need to solve this question are contained in one infallible book?