Science, Creation & EvolutionThings overlooked by EvolutionistsJovaro wrote:Aineo wrote:The speed of light has been defined as constant it has not been shown to be constant. That Jovaro, is the difference.
But it has been shown as a constant dear Aineo. Just not for more than 50 years, since there haven't been accurate measurements from before that time.
Even this so-called scientist Setterfield says in his research that c seems to have stabilised since 1960 orso.
You need to update your information. Did you read the information on the link I posted? These results kicked off a series of lively debates in the scientific community during the first half of the 20th century. Raymond Birge, highly respected chairman of the physics department at the University of California, Berkeley, had, from 1929 on, established himself as an arbiter of the values of atomic constants. [4] The speed of light is considered an atomic constant. However Birge's recommended values for the speed of light decreased steadily until 1940, when an article written by him, entitled "The General Physical Constants, as of August 1940 with details on the velocity of light only," appeared in Reports on Progress in Physics (Vol. 8, pp.90-100, 1941). Birge began the article saying: "This paper is being written on request - and at this time on request ... a belief in any significant variability of the constants of nature is fatal to the spirit of science, as science is now understood [emphasis his]." These words, from this man, for whatever reason he wrote them, shut down the debate on the speed of light.
http://www.ldolphin.org/cdk-helen.html
Now why don't you read the article and then check out the information shared that has become available since 1999. There are to many anomalies in astronomy that void the concept that c is constant.
Talk Origins is not exactly an unbiased site so why not broaden your horizens and check out the issue from other sources.
| View Parent Message View dfilename Return Home |