ArchivedMATTHEW 1:23, ISAIAH 7:11, a prophecy fulfilled?Dude, Here is what I said: There you go, your church knows that the Septuagint is mostly mistranslated, and that is why you have lots of translation errors when compared to the hebrew bible. Alpha now clearly understands my argument that this can not be a dual prophecy if the word means virgin. I would rather you scorpion, read for yourself, use your own logic and answer. It's ok to learn from other websites and books of course, but pasting a whole website will make this forum useless. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Alpha, You can read my post above and compare it with your link. Now if you want to think of it as dual prophecy, this will not work also. The sign is for Ahaz to SEE and KNOW, it will happen to confirm he will win against the Assyrians. There is no way that Isiaih is telling Ahaz that in 700 years years a boy will be born and this is the sign that the lord will show you to prove to you that you will overcome your enemies. One can clearly read and compare. The ghost wroter of MATTHEW used the Septuagint. As he did on so many other occasions. When comparing the Septuagint with the hebrew bible we see some major differences. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame