Alexei wrote:the Bible versions which refer to Jesus as the servant of God, also refer to him as the Son of God in certain passages.
Which conclude to serious doubting wether he is Son of God in the term of servant of God, or Son of God in term of divinity as Christians dream.
The NIV in some passages says Jesus is a servant of God. And as you know we are all servants of God. So, when the NIV says Jesus is God's
one and only Son, common sense tells you it is not in terms of being a servant of God, but in terms of divinity. For "one and only" is an exclusive title.
Alexei wrote:If I was a Muslim, I would be more concerned about the lack of evidence there is to support Jesus' non-crucifixion compared to Jesus' crucifixion. For isn't the word of God going to say "test all things and hold fast to what is good." ?(1 Thessalonians 5:21). How then am I suppose to believe the Qu'ran when it says Jesus was not crucified, with its lack of evidence to support it?
Simply Because the Noble Qur'an is the real word of God!
And if you were a Muslim you will be saved.
Telling me that the Qu'ran is the real word of God in response to a question which demands evidence does not help anyone.
Alexei wrote:Eventhough you might have different Bible versions with different wording, they ALL still have the overall theme of Jesus dying on the cross for the sins of man, and salvation is though Him and His work at the cross.
Typical Christian heresy. When they fail to prove the accuracy of the Bible, they run to say that eventhough they all agree on an alleged Jesus crucifiction and a silly salvation just like the ancient myths.
The things I am telling you are fundamental Christian teachings, essentials, theology 101. Yet, you still have not proven to me that Jesus was not crucified. If I follow that theory, then you can use the word heresy.