Science, Creation & EvolutionThe dangers of EvolutionFirst, I have never said the human eye is poorly designed. I said it is adequately designed and adapted for the environment it is in, but could certainly be better. And you are free to refuse to learn about the multiple lines of independent evidence that support eye evolution, evidence that has been shown to you repeatedly. 'Ignorance is bliss' may work for you, but don't expect the rest of the world to follow suit. Once again, you refuse to answer my questions which show the lack of support for your position "A bigger question for you is - why are there so many different kinds of eyes in the first place? Why would an all powerful Intelligent Designer purposely make a vision system with any flaws? Evolutionary theory provides a simple, direct explanation for the development of different vision systems, including corroborating evidence in the form of genetic and molecular similarities. What can ID offer besides personal incredulity?" Finally, your camera analogy is flat out wrong, as has also been shown to you already. You focus (no pun intended) on one particular aspect of image production, and ignore all the other problems with "human eye" camera design that camera designers consciously avoid. I guess what they say is true - you can lead a creationist to the scientific data, but you can’t make him think. Tiggy |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame