In other words H20, now you contradict the typical claim of temporary Muslims that no human being would be able to predict the science of the Koran until the emergence of modern science.
You have clearly stated that at this point that the so-called miraculous scientific predictions of the Koran could be (and basically is) known to the ancient community.
This is certainly a significant downfall for Muslim apologetic, at least when considering what has been claimed by a range of Muslims up to this point.
The issues you brought up in your post can certainly be refuted, you claim that Muhammad was simply a poor, uneducated individual of the Arab dessert, I hear frequently that Arabia as a whole was in the same state.
Let me challenge you in the same way as Muslims and atheists alike challenge Christians: how do you prove your claim?
Forget all about using the Koran, the hadiths or any historical piece of source or information, you Muslims do not believe in that sort of evidence anyway. In that case the historical evidences for the New Testament would have and should have convinced every Muslim (that is however not the issue here now).
Thus, I will challenge you again, how can you completely prove to me that Muhammad was totally uneducated, and Arabia was totally uneffected by the science and philosophy of the day?
Go ahead bro