Abortion Memorial ServiceTruth About Roe vs. Wadeuh? as a Texan, I must correct your post. Wade was not the county, but the district atterny. The case was filed in Dallas county in city of Dallas Texas. The whole thing was based on the supposed ambiguity of the constitution as to when life begins. The court claimed that at that point in human knowlege, no one could say for sure when person hood began, and that meant that the mother's right to privacy out wieghed the babies right to live. The court also said that if congress ever established the person hood of the pre-born, that the complantants had no case because the 14th amendment would thus protect them. This issue could end tommorow if congress ever passed a bill that said that pre-born children are persons. If that bill also said that it was not for judicial review, the courts could never touch it. All this is very clearly laid out in our constitution. If you count down 40 [40 is the biblical number for generations] words in the openning statement of the constitution, you will find the word posterity . If you look up the word posterity in a good dictionary, you will find out that it means future generations. The constitution is not ambiguos as to protection of life in the womb, for life in the womb is the consumet definition of posterity and future generations. If we are to win this battle for life, we must get our facts straight, and keep our focus on establishing person hood for pre-born children. Send me a mailing address, and I will send you materials that win the day on this issue every time. [email addy removed by newseed according to forum rule #10] |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame