Science, Creation & EvolutionRing SpeciesWhen you do not want to accept that faith is not based in empirical or even theoretical science you label me a liar. And in order to try to prove a fallacious point you ignore the only primary source dealing with the Noahic flood. Not a single mention of insects. Now, it is a bit hypocritical of you to tell me I do not understand evolution and I do not understand Biblical faith while at the same time posting outright lies concerning a Biblical account you have probably never read. Since this is a science forum why do you find it odd that I use accepted scientific terminology or that I appeal to the scientific method? Also, you keep posting the "best current explanation" and I accept that the theory of evolution is the "best current explanation" for the diversity of life. However, Einsteins GR and SR are currently accepted by most scientists as the "best current explanation" of relativity, which ignores an accepted alternate explanation known as Lorentzian relativity. So what does this have to do with evolution? TIME. It took the scientific community well over 50 years to accept that the speed of light is not finite. Scientists are some of the most bigoted people around when it comes to rethinking their favorite theories. For someone who appeals to science I find it odd that you ignore biology and the fact that plants can survive being totally submersed in water for extended periods and long periods of drought. So your rationale concerning the flood continues down the dismal path of rejecting what is written as well as biology. Ah, so you are going to judge all Christians based on Catholicism while ignoring that scientists have been the most rabid opponents of change. For instance Pasteur and Newton was denigrated by their peers and most of the western scientists who are icons of their disciplines were devout Christians. Ah, speciation of finches does not take vast amounts of time and since you are appealing to speciation as observable proof of evolution, you just agreed that evolution does not take vast amounts of time. Ah, so you appeal to ice coring and 700,000 years but do not understand that in order to confirm the 700,000 years "c" as a constant is used in computing the years. You see Pigblood I have checked into dating methods and how these ages are determined and apparently you have not. You see our concept of time is tied to the speed of light. What has happened since 1999 begs the question concerning what happened millennia past. Tifft by using quantum physics has demonstrated with unimpeachable math light speed may have decayed by as much as 1010 times and I will repeat Tifft is not an ID advocate or a creationist. He is a scientist who follows the data and theories be damned. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame