Apologetics Forum: Ask questions about Christianity/Debate doctrinescatholicsTry disgust and amazement at the stupidity demonstrated by an intelligent woman who takes Scripture dealing with attitude and makes it about nature, who decided that echad the Hebrew word for one means to form, and has defined elohyim to mean what she wants it to mean when manuscript evidence exposes your definition is fallacious. Angry, sorry tuppence trying to interpret my posts to mean what you want them to mean is as ludicrous as taking one statement by Thomas as of greater import that the Lord's many statements that the Father is the only true God. Why get angry with the willfully blind? Ah, so when you asked me to make you mod of the ID Forum instead of the Science Forum you did not know about it? The ID Forum was your idea. This tuppence is the usual cry baby response we get here when judgmental bigots come up against logical responses to illogical traditions that void Biblical truth. If Unitarians are doomed to hell then all the OT prophets are doomed to hell. Let's fact it tuppence the Hebrews used singular pronouns with a plural noun and singular verbs with a plural noun to describe what you term a plural god. Pagan Greeks decided God was first a duality then a Trinity. I find it fitting that your last post is a cry baby temper tantrum, and I pray the scales of tradition will drop from your eyes so that as Jesus said "your will know the truth and the truth will set you free.". |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame